Skip to content
🎉 DeepSeek-R1 🥳
Find all quadruples ((a, b, c, d)) of real numbers that simultaneously satisfy the following equations:[left{begin{aligned}a^{3}+c^{3} & =2 a^{2} b+c^{2} d & =0 b^{3}+d^{3} & =1 a b^{2}+c d^{2} & =-6end{aligned}right.]

💡Okay, so I have this system of equations with four variables: a, b, c, and d. The equations are:1. ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 )2. ( a^2 b + c^2 d = 0 )3. ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 )4. ( a b^2 + c d^2 = -6 )Hmm, I need to find all quadruples (a, b, c, d) that satisfy these equations simultaneously. Let me see how to approach this.First, I notice that the equations involve cubes and products of variables. Maybe I can find a way to relate these equations or express some variables in terms of others. Let me look for patterns or symmetries.Looking at equations 1 and 3, both are sums of cubes. Maybe I can use the identity for the sum of cubes: ( x^3 + y^3 = (x + y)(x^2 - xy + y^2) ). But I'm not sure if that will help directly here. Let me see.Equation 1: ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 ). If I factor this, it becomes ( (a + c)(a^2 - a c + c^2) = 2 ).Equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). Similarly, this factors to ( (b + d)(b^2 - b d + d^2) = 1 ).I don't know if that helps yet. Maybe I can consider equations 2 and 4 together. Equation 2 is ( a^2 b + c^2 d = 0 ) and equation 4 is ( a b^2 + c d^2 = -6 ).These look similar in structure. Maybe I can think of them as dot products or something. Alternatively, perhaps I can express one variable in terms of others.Let me consider equations 2 and 4. If I write them as:( a^2 b = -c^2 d ) (from equation 2)( a b^2 = -c d^2 - 6 ) (from equation 4)Hmm, maybe I can solve for b and d in terms of a and c. Let me try.From equation 2: ( a^2 b = -c^2 d ) => ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d ), assuming ( a neq 0 ).Similarly, from equation 4: ( a b^2 = -c d^2 - 6 ). If I substitute b from equation 2 into this, I get:( a left( -frac{c^2}{a^2} d right)^2 = -c d^2 - 6 )Let me compute the left side:( a left( frac{c^4}{a^4} d^2 right) = frac{c^4}{a^3} d^2 )So, equation 4 becomes:( frac{c^4}{a^3} d^2 = -c d^2 - 6 )Let me multiply both sides by ( a^3 ) to eliminate the denominator:( c^4 d^2 = -c a^3 d^2 - 6 a^3 )Hmm, this seems complicated. Maybe I can factor out ( c d^2 ):( c d^2 (c^3 + a^3) = -6 a^3 )Wait, from equation 1, ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 ). So, ( c^3 + a^3 = 2 ). Therefore, the equation becomes:( c d^2 (2) = -6 a^3 )Simplify:( 2 c d^2 = -6 a^3 ) => ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 )So, ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ). Let me note this as equation 5.Now, going back to equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). From equation 2, we have ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d ). Let me substitute this into equation 3.So, ( left( -frac{c^2}{a^2} d right)^3 + d^3 = 1 )Compute the first term:( -frac{c^6}{a^6} d^3 + d^3 = 1 )Factor out ( d^3 ):( d^3 left( 1 - frac{c^6}{a^6} right) = 1 )Hmm, this is getting more complicated. Maybe I need a different approach.Let me think about the original equations again. Maybe I can consider the variables in pairs, like (a, c) and (b, d). Equations 1 and 3 involve only a, c and b, d respectively, while equations 2 and 4 mix them.Another idea: Maybe I can use substitution or elimination. Let me see if I can express b and d in terms of a and c, then substitute into equations 1 and 3.From equation 2: ( a^2 b + c^2 d = 0 ) => ( a^2 b = -c^2 d ) => ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d ) (assuming ( a neq 0 ))From equation 4: ( a b^2 + c d^2 = -6 ). Substitute b from above:( a left( -frac{c^2}{a^2} d right)^2 + c d^2 = -6 )Compute the first term:( a cdot frac{c^4}{a^4} d^2 = frac{c^4}{a^3} d^2 )So, equation 4 becomes:( frac{c^4}{a^3} d^2 + c d^2 = -6 )Factor out ( c d^2 ):( c d^2 left( frac{c^3}{a^3} + 1 right) = -6 )But from equation 1, ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 ), so ( frac{c^3}{a^3} = frac{2 - a^3}{a^3} = frac{2}{a^3} - 1 )Substitute this into the equation:( c d^2 left( frac{2}{a^3} - 1 + 1 right) = -6 )Simplify inside the parentheses:( frac{2}{a^3} )So, equation becomes:( c d^2 cdot frac{2}{a^3} = -6 )Multiply both sides by ( a^3 ):( 2 c d^2 = -6 a^3 )Which simplifies to:( c d^2 = -3 a^3 )Wait, this is the same as equation 5 I derived earlier. So, that's consistent.Now, from equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 )Let me see if I can express d in terms of a and c. From equation 5:( d^2 = -frac{3 a^3}{c} )But ( d^2 ) must be non-negative since it's a square. So, ( -frac{3 a^3}{c} geq 0 )This implies that ( frac{a^3}{c} leq 0 ). So, either ( a^3 ) and c have opposite signs, or one of them is zero.But from equation 1, ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 ). If a or c were zero, the other would have to be cube root of 2 or -2, but let's check.If a = 0, then ( c^3 = 2 ) => c = ( sqrt[3]{2} ). Then from equation 2: ( 0 + c^2 d = 0 ) => ( c^2 d = 0 ). Since c ≠ 0, d must be 0. Then from equation 3: ( b^3 + 0 = 1 ) => b = 1. From equation 4: ( 0 + c d^2 = -6 ). But d = 0, so 0 = -6, which is impossible. So, a cannot be zero.Similarly, if c = 0, then ( a^3 = 2 ) => a = ( sqrt[3]{2} ). From equation 2: ( a^2 b + 0 = 0 ) => b = 0. From equation 3: ( 0 + d^3 = 1 ) => d = 1. From equation 4: ( a b^2 + 0 = -6 ). But b = 0, so 0 = -6, which is impossible. So, c cannot be zero.Therefore, both a and c are non-zero, and from ( frac{a^3}{c} leq 0 ), we have that a and c have opposite signs.So, either a > 0 and c < 0, or a < 0 and c > 0.Let me proceed.From equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 )From equation 2: ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d )From equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). Substitute b from equation 2:( left( -frac{c^2}{a^2} d right)^3 + d^3 = 1 )Compute the first term:( -frac{c^6}{a^6} d^3 + d^3 = 1 )Factor out ( d^3 ):( d^3 left( 1 - frac{c^6}{a^6} right) = 1 )Let me write this as:( d^3 = frac{1}{1 - frac{c^6}{a^6}} = frac{a^6}{a^6 - c^6} )But from equation 1, ( a^3 + c^3 = 2 ). Let me denote ( a^3 = x ), so ( c^3 = 2 - x ). Then ( a^6 = x^2 ), ( c^6 = (2 - x)^2 ).So, ( a^6 - c^6 = x^2 - (2 - x)^2 = x^2 - (4 - 4x + x^2) = 4x - 4 )Therefore, ( d^3 = frac{x^2}{4x - 4} = frac{x^2}{4(x - 1)} )So, ( d = sqrt[3]{frac{x^2}{4(x - 1)}} )But x = a^3, so:( d = sqrt[3]{frac{a^6}{4(a^3 - 1)}} )Hmm, this is getting quite involved. Maybe I can express everything in terms of a single variable.Let me try to express c in terms of a from equation 1: ( c^3 = 2 - a^3 ) => ( c = sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} )Similarly, from equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ) => ( d^2 = -frac{3 a^3}{c} )But c is expressed in terms of a, so:( d^2 = -frac{3 a^3}{sqrt[3]{2 - a^3}} )Since d^2 must be non-negative, the right-hand side must be non-negative. So:( -frac{3 a^3}{sqrt[3]{2 - a^3}} geq 0 )This implies that ( frac{a^3}{sqrt[3]{2 - a^3}} leq 0 )So, either both numerator and denominator are negative, or both are positive.But let's analyze:Case 1: ( a^3 > 0 ) and ( sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} < 0 )This would require ( a > 0 ) and ( 2 - a^3 < 0 ) => ( a^3 > 2 ) => ( a > sqrt[3]{2} )Case 2: ( a^3 < 0 ) and ( sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} > 0 )This would require ( a < 0 ) and ( 2 - a^3 > 0 ). Since a is negative, ( a^3 ) is negative, so ( 2 - a^3 > 2 ), which is always positive.So, possible cases are:1. ( a > sqrt[3]{2} )2. ( a < 0 )Let me consider these cases separately.Case 1: ( a > sqrt[3]{2} )In this case, ( c = sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} ). Since ( a^3 > 2 ), ( 2 - a^3 < 0 ), so c is negative.From equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ). Since c is negative and a^3 is positive, the right-hand side is negative. But d^2 is non-negative, so c must be negative to make the left-hand side negative, which is consistent.From equation 5: ( d^2 = -frac{3 a^3}{c} = -frac{3 a^3}{sqrt[3]{2 - a^3}} )But since ( 2 - a^3 < 0 ), ( sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} ) is negative, so ( -frac{3 a^3}{sqrt[3]{2 - a^3}} ) is positive, as it should be.So, d is real.From equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). From equation 2: ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d )So, ( b = -frac{(sqrt[3]{2 - a^3})^2}{a^2} d )Let me compute ( b^3 ):( b^3 = -frac{(2 - a^3)^{2/3}}{a^6} d^3 )From equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ), so:( -frac{(2 - a^3)^{2/3}}{a^6} d^3 + d^3 = 1 )Factor out ( d^3 ):( d^3 left( 1 - frac{(2 - a^3)^{2/3}}{a^6} right) = 1 )Let me express ( (2 - a^3)^{2/3} ) as ( left( (2 - a^3)^{1/3} right)^2 = c^2 )So, equation becomes:( d^3 left( 1 - frac{c^2}{a^6} right) = 1 )But from equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ) => ( d^2 = -frac{3 a^3}{c} ) => ( d = sqrt{ -frac{3 a^3}{c} } ). Wait, but d is real, so the expression inside the square root must be non-negative, which we already considered.But this seems circular. Maybe I need to find a relationship between a and d.Alternatively, let me consider that from equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ). Since c = ( sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} ), we have:( sqrt[3]{2 - a^3} cdot d^2 = -3 a^3 )Let me cube both sides to eliminate the cube root:( (2 - a^3) cdot d^6 = (-3 a^3)^3 = -27 a^9 )So,( (2 - a^3) d^6 = -27 a^9 )But from equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). From equation 2: ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d ), so ( b^3 = -frac{c^6}{a^6} d^3 )Thus, equation 3 becomes:( -frac{c^6}{a^6} d^3 + d^3 = 1 )Factor out ( d^3 ):( d^3 left( 1 - frac{c^6}{a^6} right) = 1 )Again, ( c^6 = (2 - a^3)^2 ), so:( d^3 left( 1 - frac{(2 - a^3)^2}{a^6} right) = 1 )Let me denote ( t = a^3 ), so ( c^3 = 2 - t ), and ( c^6 = (2 - t)^2 ). Then, equation becomes:( d^3 left( 1 - frac{(2 - t)^2}{t^2} right) = 1 )Simplify the expression inside the parentheses:( 1 - frac{(2 - t)^2}{t^2} = frac{t^2 - (4 - 4t + t^2)}{t^2} = frac{4t - 4}{t^2} = frac{4(t - 1)}{t^2} )So, equation becomes:( d^3 cdot frac{4(t - 1)}{t^2} = 1 ) => ( d^3 = frac{t^2}{4(t - 1)} )But from earlier, we have:( (2 - t) d^6 = -27 t^3 )From ( d^3 = frac{t^2}{4(t - 1)} ), we can write ( d^6 = left( frac{t^2}{4(t - 1)} right)^2 = frac{t^4}{16(t - 1)^2} )Substitute into the equation:( (2 - t) cdot frac{t^4}{16(t - 1)^2} = -27 t^3 )Multiply both sides by 16(t - 1)^2:( (2 - t) t^4 = -27 t^3 cdot 16(t - 1)^2 )Simplify:( (2 - t) t^4 = -432 t^3 (t - 1)^2 )Divide both sides by t^3 (assuming t ≠ 0, which is true since a ≠ 0):( (2 - t) t = -432 (t - 1)^2 )Expand both sides:Left side: ( 2t - t^2 )Right side: ( -432(t^2 - 2t + 1) = -432 t^2 + 864 t - 432 )Bring all terms to one side:( 2t - t^2 + 432 t^2 - 864 t + 432 = 0 )Combine like terms:( ( -t^2 + 432 t^2 ) + (2t - 864 t) + 432 = 0 )( 431 t^2 - 862 t + 432 = 0 )Simplify by dividing all terms by 431:( t^2 - 2 t + frac{432}{431} = 0 )Wait, 432 / 431 is approximately 1.0023, but let me check the calculation again because this seems messy.Wait, let me double-check the previous steps.After expanding:Left side: ( 2t - t^2 )Right side: ( -432 t^2 + 864 t - 432 )Bring all terms to left:( 2t - t^2 + 432 t^2 - 864 t + 432 = 0 )Combine like terms:- t^2 + 432 t^2 = 431 t^22t - 864 t = -862 tSo, equation is:( 431 t^2 - 862 t + 432 = 0 )Divide by 431:( t^2 - 2 t + frac{432}{431} = 0 )Compute discriminant:( D = ( -2 )^2 - 4 cdot 1 cdot frac{432}{431} = 4 - frac{1728}{431} )Convert 4 to ( frac{1724}{431} ):( D = frac{1724}{431} - frac{1728}{431} = -frac{4}{431} )Negative discriminant, so no real solutions in this case.So, Case 1: ( a > sqrt[3]{2} ) leads to no real solutions.Case 2: ( a < 0 )In this case, from equation 1: ( c^3 = 2 - a^3 ). Since a < 0, ( a^3 < 0 ), so ( c^3 = 2 - a^3 > 2 ), so c > ( sqrt[3]{2} ).From equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ). Since c > 0 and a^3 < 0, the right-hand side is positive, so d^2 is positive, which is fine.From equation 2: ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d ). Since c > 0, a^2 > 0, so b = -k d, where k > 0.From equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ). Substitute b:( (-k d)^3 + d^3 = 1 ) => ( -k^3 d^3 + d^3 = 1 ) => ( d^3 (1 - k^3) = 1 )From equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 ). Since a < 0, let me write a = -m, where m > 0.So, a = -m, m > 0.Then, ( a^3 = -m^3 ), so ( c^3 = 2 - (-m^3) = 2 + m^3 ) => c = ( sqrt[3]{2 + m^3} )From equation 5: ( c d^2 = -3 a^3 = -3 (-m^3) = 3 m^3 )So, ( d^2 = frac{3 m^3}{c} = frac{3 m^3}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} )From equation 2: ( b = -frac{c^2}{a^2} d = -frac{(sqrt[3]{2 + m^3})^2}{m^2} d )Let me compute ( k = frac{c^2}{m^2} = frac{(2 + m^3)^{2/3}}{m^2} )So, b = -k dFrom equation 3: ( b^3 + d^3 = 1 ) => ( (-k d)^3 + d^3 = 1 ) => ( -k^3 d^3 + d^3 = 1 ) => ( d^3 (1 - k^3) = 1 )So, ( d^3 = frac{1}{1 - k^3} )But k = ( frac{(2 + m^3)^{2/3}}{m^2} ), so ( k^3 = frac{(2 + m^3)^2}{m^6} )Thus, ( d^3 = frac{1}{1 - frac{(2 + m^3)^2}{m^6}} = frac{m^6}{m^6 - (2 + m^3)^2} )Simplify denominator:( m^6 - (4 + 4 m^3 + m^6) = -4 - 4 m^3 )So, ( d^3 = frac{m^6}{-4 - 4 m^3} = -frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} )Thus, ( d = sqrt[3]{ -frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} } = -sqrt[3]{ frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} } )Since d is real, this is fine.From equation 5: ( d^2 = frac{3 m^3}{c} = frac{3 m^3}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} )But from above, ( d^3 = -frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} ), so ( d^2 = left( d^3 right)^{2/3} = left( -frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} right)^{2/3} )But this seems complicated. Alternatively, let me express d in terms of m.From ( d^3 = -frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)} ), we have:( d = -sqrt[3]{frac{m^6}{4(m^3 + 1)}} = -frac{m^2}{sqrt[3]{4(m^3 + 1)}} )So, ( d = -frac{m^2}{sqrt[3]{4(m^3 + 1)}} )From equation 5: ( d^2 = frac{3 m^3}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} )Compute ( d^2 ):( d^2 = left( -frac{m^2}{sqrt[3]{4(m^3 + 1)}} right)^2 = frac{m^4}{sqrt[3]{16(m^3 + 1)^2}} )Set equal to equation 5:( frac{m^4}{sqrt[3]{16(m^3 + 1)^2}} = frac{3 m^3}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} )Multiply both sides by ( sqrt[3]{16(m^3 + 1)^2} ):( m^4 = 3 m^3 cdot frac{sqrt[3]{16(m^3 + 1)^2}}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} )Simplify the fraction:( frac{sqrt[3]{16(m^3 + 1)^2}}{sqrt[3]{2 + m^3}} = sqrt[3]{frac{16(m^3 + 1)^2}{2 + m^3}} )Note that ( m^3 + 1 = (m + 1)(m^2 - m + 1) ), but not sure if that helps.Let me denote ( n = m^3 ), so ( n > 0 ). Then, equation becomes:( m^4 = 3 m^3 cdot sqrt[3]{frac{16(n + 1)^2}{n + 2}} )Divide both sides by ( m^3 ) (since m > 0):( m = 3 cdot sqrt[3]{frac{16(n + 1)^2}{n + 2}} )But ( n = m^3 ), so:( m = 3 cdot sqrt[3]{frac{16(m^3 + 1)^2}{m^3 + 2}} )Let me cube both sides:( m^3 = 27 cdot frac{16(m^3 + 1)^2}{m^3 + 2} )Simplify:( m^3 (m^3 + 2) = 432 (m^3 + 1)^2 )Expand both sides:Left side: ( m^6 + 2 m^3 )Right side: ( 432 (m^6 + 2 m^3 + 1) )Bring all terms to left:( m^6 + 2 m^3 - 432 m^6 - 864 m^3 - 432 = 0 )Combine like terms:( (1 - 432) m^6 + (2 - 864) m^3 - 432 = 0 )( -431 m^6 - 862 m^3 - 432 = 0 )Multiply both sides by -1:( 431 m^6 + 862 m^3 + 432 = 0 )Let me denote ( p = m^3 ), so equation becomes:( 431 p^2 + 862 p + 432 = 0 )Divide all terms by 431:( p^2 + 2 p + frac{432}{431} = 0 )Compute discriminant:( D = 4 - 4 cdot 1 cdot frac{432}{431} = 4 - frac{1728}{431} )Convert 4 to ( frac{1724}{431} ):( D = frac{1724}{431} - frac{1728}{431} = -frac{4}{431} )Negative discriminant again, so no real solutions in this case.Therefore, both cases lead to no real solutions. Hence, the system has no real solutions.

Find the phase shift and amplitude of the graph of y = 2sin (4x - frac{pi}{2}).

💡Okay, so I have this problem here: I need to find the phase shift and amplitude of the graph of y equals 2 sine of (4x minus pi over 2). Hmm, alright. Let me think about how to approach this.First, I remember that the general form of a sine function is y equals A sine(Bx minus C). In this form, A represents the amplitude, B affects the period, and C is related to the phase shift. So, comparing this to my equation, y equals 2 sine(4x minus pi/2), I can identify A, B, and C.Let me write that down:y = 2 sin(4x - π/2)So, A is 2, B is 4, and C is π/2. Got that.Now, amplitude is straightforward, right? The amplitude is just the absolute value of A. So, in this case, A is 2, so the amplitude is 2. That seems simple enough.But what about the phase shift? I think the phase shift is calculated by dividing C by B, but I need to make sure I get the direction right. I recall that if the function is y = A sin(Bx - C), the phase shift is C divided by B. But wait, is it to the right or to the left?Let me think. If it's y = A sin(Bx - C), it's equivalent to y = A sin(B(x - C/B)). So, this means the graph is shifted to the right by C/B. So, yes, the phase shift is C divided by B, and it's a shift to the right.So, in my case, C is π/2 and B is 4. Therefore, the phase shift should be (π/2) divided by 4, which is π/8. So, the phase shift is π/8 to the right.Wait, let me double-check that. If I rewrite the equation as y = 2 sin(4(x - π/8)), then yes, it's shifted π/8 units to the right. That makes sense.So, putting it all together, the amplitude is 2, and the phase shift is π/8 to the right.I think that's it. But just to be thorough, let me review the steps:1. Identify the general form: y = A sin(Bx - C).2. Compare with the given equation: y = 2 sin(4x - π/2).3. Extract A, B, and C: A = 2, B = 4, C = π/2.4. Calculate amplitude: |A| = 2.5. Calculate phase shift: C/B = (π/2)/4 = π/8.6. Determine direction: Since it's in the form (Bx - C), it's a shift to the right.Yep, that all checks out. I don't think I made any mistakes here. It seems pretty straightforward once I break it down step by step.Just to visualize, the amplitude of 2 means the graph will go up to 2 and down to -2. The phase shift of π/8 means that instead of starting at the origin, it starts π/8 units to the right. The period, which is 2π divided by B, would be 2π/4 = π/2, but since the question only asks for amplitude and phase shift, I don't need to worry about that right now.So, in summary, the amplitude is 2, and the phase shift is π/8 to the right.

Find the focus of the parabola y = -2x^2 + 5.

💡Okay, so I need to find the focus of the parabola given by the equation ( y = -2x^2 + 5 ). Hmm, I remember that parabolas have a vertex and a focus, and depending on the direction they open, the focus is located at a certain point relative to the vertex. First, let me recall the standard forms of a parabola. There's the standard form for a vertical parabola, which is ( y = ax^2 + bx + c ), and the vertex form, which is ( y = a(x - h)^2 + k ), where ( (h, k) ) is the vertex. Since the given equation is ( y = -2x^2 + 5 ), it looks like it's already in the standard form, but without the ( bx ) term. So, that means ( b = 0 ) here. I think the vertex form will be helpful because it directly gives me the vertex coordinates. Let me try to rewrite the given equation into vertex form. Since there's no ( bx ) term, the equation simplifies to ( y = -2x^2 + 5 ), which is the same as ( y = -2(x - 0)^2 + 5 ). So, the vertex ( (h, k) ) is at ( (0, 5) ). That makes sense because when ( x = 0 ), ( y = 5 ), so the vertex is at the point ( (0, 5) ).Now, to find the focus, I remember that for a parabola in the form ( y = ax^2 + bx + c ), the focus is located at a distance of ( frac{1}{4a} ) from the vertex. But wait, I need to be careful here because the coefficient ( a ) affects the direction the parabola opens. If ( a ) is positive, the parabola opens upwards, and if ( a ) is negative, it opens downwards. In this case, ( a = -2 ), so the parabola opens downward.So, the formula for the focus when the parabola is in the form ( y = ax^2 ) is ( (0, frac{1}{4a}) ) relative to the vertex. But since our vertex is at ( (0, 5) ), I need to adjust this formula accordingly. Let me write down the formula for the focus. If the vertex is ( (h, k) ), then the focus is at ( (h, k + frac{1}{4a}) ). Since ( a = -2 ), plugging that in, the focus should be at ( (0, 5 + frac{1}{4(-2)}) ). Calculating ( frac{1}{4a} ), that's ( frac{1}{4(-2)} = frac{1}{-8} = -frac{1}{8} ). So, the focus is at ( (0, 5 - frac{1}{8}) ). Now, I need to compute ( 5 - frac{1}{8} ). Converting 5 into eighths, that's ( frac{40}{8} ). So, ( frac{40}{8} - frac{1}{8} = frac{39}{8} ). Therefore, the focus is at ( (0, frac{39}{8}) ).Wait, let me double-check my steps to make sure I didn't make any mistakes. Starting from the equation ( y = -2x^2 + 5 ), I identified the vertex correctly at ( (0, 5) ). Then, using the formula for the focus, which is ( (h, k + frac{1}{4a}) ), I substituted ( a = -2 ), so ( frac{1}{4a} = -frac{1}{8} ). Adding that to the vertex y-coordinate, ( 5 - frac{1}{8} = frac{39}{8} ). Yes, that seems correct. The focus is indeed at ( (0, frac{39}{8}) ). I think I got it right.

A man rows his boat some distance downstream and 30 km upstream, taking 3 hours each time. The speed of the stream is 7 km/h. How far did he row downstream?

💡First, I need to determine the speed of the boat in still water. I know that the man rows 30 km upstream in 3 hours, and the speed of the stream is 7 km/h. Using the formula for speed, which is distance divided by time, I can set up the equation for the upstream journey.Next, I'll solve this equation to find the speed of the boat in still water. Once I have the boat's speed, I can use it to calculate the distance rowed downstream. Since the time taken for the downstream journey is also 3 hours, I'll apply the same formula for speed but this time for the downstream scenario.Finally, by plugging in the known values, I can find the distance the man rowed downstream.

Given the graph of ( y = g(x) ) for ( -4 leq x leq 4 ), determine the range of ( g(x) - 2x ). The graph of ( y = g(x) ) is as follows, with ( g(x) ) defined piecewise linearly through points ( (-4, -2) ), ( (-2, -1) ), ( (0, 0) ), ( (2, 3) ), and ( (4, 4) ).

💡Okay, so I need to figure out the range of ( g(x) - 2x ) given the graph of ( y = g(x) ) which is piecewise linear through the points ( (-4, -2) ), ( (-2, -1) ), ( (0, 0) ), ( (2, 3) ), and ( (4, 4) ). Hmm, let me think about how to approach this.First, I know that the range of a function is the set of all possible output values (y-values) it can produce. So, in this case, I need to find all possible values of ( g(x) - 2x ) as ( x ) varies from -4 to 4.Since ( g(x) ) is piecewise linear, it means it's made up of straight line segments connecting the given points. That should make things easier because I can analyze each segment separately.Let me list out the points again to visualize the graph:- ( (-4, -2) )- ( (-2, -1) )- ( (0, 0) )- ( (2, 3) )- ( (4, 4) )So, the graph of ( g(x) ) is a series of connected line segments between these points. Now, I need to consider the function ( h(x) = g(x) - 2x ). Essentially, this is subtracting ( 2x ) from each y-value of ( g(x) ).To find the range of ( h(x) ), I can evaluate ( h(x) ) at each of the given points and also check if there are any maximum or minimum values within the intervals between these points.Let me start by calculating ( h(x) ) at each of the given points:1. At ( x = -4 ): ( h(-4) = g(-4) - 2(-4) = -2 + 8 = 6 )2. At ( x = -2 ): ( h(-2) = g(-2) - 2(-2) = -1 + 4 = 3 )3. At ( x = 0 ): ( h(0) = g(0) - 2(0) = 0 - 0 = 0 )4. At ( x = 2 ): ( h(2) = g(2) - 2(2) = 3 - 4 = -1 )5. At ( x = 4 ): ( h(4) = g(4) - 2(4) = 4 - 8 = -4 )So, at the given points, ( h(x) ) takes the values 6, 3, 0, -1, and -4. That gives me some idea about the range, but I need to make sure there aren't any higher or lower values between these points.Since ( g(x) ) is piecewise linear, each segment between two points is a straight line. Therefore, ( h(x) = g(x) - 2x ) will also be linear on each segment because subtracting ( 2x ) is a linear operation.For a linear function, the maximum and minimum values occur at the endpoints of the interval. That means on each segment between two points, the maximum and minimum of ( h(x) ) will be at the endpoints, which are the points we've already evaluated.Therefore, the maximum value of ( h(x) ) is 6, and the minimum value is -4. So, the range of ( h(x) ) should be from -4 to 6.Wait, let me double-check to make sure I haven't missed anything. Maybe there's a segment where ( h(x) ) could be higher or lower than at the endpoints?Looking at the segments:1. Between ( x = -4 ) and ( x = -2 ): The function goes from ( -4, 6 ) to ( -2, 3 ). Since it's linear, it decreases from 6 to 3. So, no higher or lower values here.2. Between ( x = -2 ) and ( x = 0 ): From ( -2, 3 ) to ( 0, 0 ). It decreases from 3 to 0. Again, no extremes beyond the endpoints.3. Between ( x = 0 ) and ( x = 2 ): From ( 0, 0 ) to ( 2, -1 ). It decreases from 0 to -1. Still, no new extremes.4. Between ( x = 2 ) and ( x = 4 ): From ( 2, -1 ) to ( 4, -4 ). It decreases further to -4. So, the minimum is at x=4.Therefore, my initial conclusion seems correct. The range of ( g(x) - 2x ) is from -4 to 6.I think that's it. I don't see any mistakes in my reasoning. The key was recognizing that since ( h(x) ) is linear on each segment, the extrema occur at the endpoints, which we've already calculated.

Among the set of numbers 2, 0, 1, 5, when randomly selecting three different numbers, the probability that the number 2 is the median of the three different numbers is (    )A: boxed{dfrac{3}{4}}B: boxed{dfrac{5}{8}}C: boxed{dfrac{1}{2}}D: boxed{dfrac{1}{4}}

💡First, identify the total number of ways to select three different numbers from the set {2, 0, 1, 5}. There are 4 possible combinations: (2, 0, 1), (2, 0, 5), (0, 1, 5), and (2, 1, 5).Next, determine which of these combinations have the number 2 as the median. To be the median, 2 must be the middle number when the three selected numbers are arranged in order. The combinations where 2 is the median are (2, 0, 5) and (2, 1, 5).There are 2 favorable combinations out of 4 total combinations. Therefore, the probability is 2/4, which simplifies to 1/2.

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded